I do agree with everyone about Asian Music having different instruments, and that it is able to bring something new to the table. But is it just the angle of having different instruments that make it appealing?
When you think back on African American music, the so called hip-hop, rap, gospel, even possibly to a certain extent R&B, jazz, and blues, it wasn’t entirely about having different instruments. Yet, it was able to penetrate into the mainstream. Sure back in the day, radios around US began supporting African American music because BMI gave them a catalogue to run with without having to deal with publishing rights issues. Although I don’t know much about Latino Music, I’m not sure if that was entirely about having different instruments and sound either.
Point being, isn’t it too stereotypical to just differentiate Asian Music as something with unique instruments? I’m more in-line with the thought of not having defined a specific catagory by the music industy, and that the form of expression has yet to congregate enough audience to penetrate into mainstream. With the industrialization around the world, capital began to dominate all industries, and music was no exception. Industry people had the notion that Asian Music doesn’t sell. Why is that? and what can be done to change this?
|